Number 1: Semgrep
Best for: codifying your own secure coding conventions across a polyglot codebase
Ranked list · SAST
9 tools, ranked Last reviewed
A practitioner's guide to ten static analysis tools, chosen for distinct scenarios rather than ranked, with the trade-offs each one brings.
The order follows the roundup The 10 Best SAST Tools, which explains each pick and where it falls short.
Best for: codifying your own secure coding conventions across a polyglot codebase
by GitHub
Best for: hunting every variant of a bug you have already found once
Best for: one enforcement gate across many repositories where quality and security share an owner
by GitLab
Best for: getting baseline scanning running in a GitLab shop without new infrastructure
by OpenText
Best for: regulated environments with legacy languages and a genuine audit evidence requirement
Best for: enforcing a central policy on compiled artifacts, including software you did not build
by Black Duck
Best for: deep defect analysis of large native C and C++ codebases
Best for: Rails applications where framework context decides whether a finding is real
Best for: pattern based scanning where the engine and rule licensing must stay permissive
methodology
How entries are chosen. Every entry is a tool with a published profile in the catalog, in Static Application Security Testing. Each note above says why it made this list, for the job in the title, separately from the tool's full profile.
Ranking is editorial. The order is a judgement by the editors about fit for this use case, not a score, a benchmark or a popularity count. A different job can produce a different order.
Advertising has no influence. Slots marked Sponsored are sold separately from the editorial. No vendor can pay to be included, to move up, or to be removed.